As many campuses begin adding AI tools into their classrooms, there is immense pressure to figure out how to quickly implements these technologies in order to avoid being left behind. As digital humanists, though, we also emphasize incorporating new technology carefully and critically which often contrasts with the ways these technologies flood bland, AI generated text into our classrooms. To this end, the presenter will offer his approach and lessons learned from implementing an assignment sequence that required students to “audit” the outputs of generative AI platforms. Students worked in small groups to develop a report that assessed the accuracy and effectiveness of the genAI platforms’ source use. In treating AI technologies as a site for critical inquiry, students acquired a more nuanced understanding of AI hallucinations and a greater appreciation for how academic sources support arguments.
Academic Integrity in the Age of AI (Bertram Gallant, Davis, & Khan, 2026) includes a speculative fiction story imagining a university in 2045, a future in which institutions layer AI onto outdated teaching and assessment models instead of rethinking academic integrity for this new era. This pop-up book club uses that story to spark conversation across two 30-minute sessions. No advance reading required - we'll hand out short quotes to react to on the spot. In the first session, we'll dig into where our own institutions already feel like they're drifting toward that imagined future. In the second session, we turn toward alternatives: what could a better path actually look like? Each session stands on its own, so come to one or both.
Academic Integrity in the Age of AI (Bertram Gallant, Davis, & Khan, 2026) includes a speculative fiction story imagining a university in 2045, a future in which institutions layer AI onto outdated teaching and assessment models instead of rethinking academic integrity for this new era. This pop-up book club uses that story to spark conversation across two 30-minute sessions. No advance reading required - we'll hand out short quotes to react to on the spot. In the first session, we'll dig into where our own institutions already feel like they're drifting toward that imagined future. In the second session, we turn toward alternatives: what could a better path actually look like? Each session stands on its own, so come to one or both.
